We’re Saying Goodbye to the Inconsiderate and Rude Prospects
By
Like most businesses, we’re hoping to leave much of 2009 far behind us, including an unpleasant trend we saw gather momentum as the year-that-wouldn’t-end continued its trek to the finish line.
Specifically, the trend is the new business prospect who is inconsiderate, rudeĀ and ill-mannered. There, we said it and it needed to be said. It seems that the past year brought more of these prospects to our doorstep than ever before. For example, we were requested to provide a proposal for a customized PR solution in less than a day to a serious business problem a firm was encountering. We dropped what we were doing and did so gladly believing it to be both urgent and a perfect fit with our capabilities. To date, three phone calls asking for feedback have yet to be returned.
Another prospect requested us to participate in their search process with three other agencies with the first step being an “information gathering” meeting. After waiting nearly 45 minutes (because the first agency was allowed to go beyond the time allotted to each participating agency), we were hurriedly ushered in to the stuffy conference room, business cards exchanged and the clock started ticking.
Within minutes of beginning our presentation, the person spearheading the search whispered to a colleague and then left the room. As of this writing, we have never heardĀ from anyone in that organization, including the person who left the room and who has also not responded to a friendly e-mail asking for an update.
Finally, we participated in numerous teleconferences with a prospect, each one requiring a revised, more detailed document until it came close to resembling a plan. A huge investment of our expertise and time. The prospect then announced they had decided to do
everything in-house, using our work as their road map, of course.
Each of these prospects are well-known organizations and with seasoned communications professionals in place. It’s baffling that any organization, but especially those of their stature, would behave as they did.
We hope 2010 brings a return to a higher caliber, more professional search process and behavior by organizations seeking to establish a relationship with a PR firm. In the meantime, we can only imagine the type of a client any of these three organizations would be if their behavior as a prospect was so distasteful.
Susan, thank you for speaking up on behalf of every PR and advertising agency. Outrageous demands to create complex marketing plans, strategies and spec creative under the guise of a proposal–without compensation. And many times, without the decency to inform the agency whether they were selected or not until we called.
Recently we received an RFP from a membership association in DC to create the theme and campaign for their annual convention. After scrambling to meet their deadline, we heard nothing, emailed and called several times, then was informed by email that they are remaining with their existing agency, despite “outstanding work and outstanding pricing”. This leads us to believe that we were invited to bid under false pretenses, i.e. the board required periodic competitive bids or they were seeking leverage to force their current agency to lower its fees.
Unfortunately we, as an industry, must own some of the blame, as we allow these practices to continue. I can’t imagine law firms or CPAs agreeing to present a defense strategy or tax recommendations before they are hired. Unfortunately, few, if any agencies, can afford to stand on principle, as someone else is always willing to forego theirs.
Thanks for commenting, Marjorie. All we’re asking for is an answer. A returned phone call or a simple response to an email. Even if it’s a “no.” Sad if that’s too much to ask after all that goes in to a PR proposal.